Presently, there is a world-wide trend towards business rescue instead of liquidation.
Ironically, South Africa as early as 1926 already was the first country outside the USA to have implemented business rescue legislation. In the current Companies Act it appears in the form of Section 427 (Judicial Management) and and Section 311 (Compromise, Amalgamation, Arrangement and Take-Overs).
Judicial management, however, has been a complete failure (Loubser, 2004).
South Africa therefore is in a position of having to pay catch-up after having been an early leader with a poor product decades ago.
The replacement of judicial management by new business rescue legislation and regulations heralds a new future for financially distressed but economically viable companies in South Africa where turnaround during informal workout has failed or is not deemed a viable option. It place South Africa on par with modern business rescue legislation in overseas jurisdictions, bar some oversights such as not explicitly recognising pre-packaged business rescue, and a softening of the originally followed USA Chapter 11 principles.
The development of Chapter 6 has been rather painful. The draft bill was followed by 4 further draft bills, the Act and the Amendment Bill. The process and the product have been subject to severe criticism in the press and a defensive posture by government - see Temkin (2010) ("Grammar Fixes Used ‘to Play down Legislation Changes’"); Newham (2010) ("New Bill Attempts to Unite Knots in Flawed Legislation"); "Pity Davies, caught between a rock and a hard place,” (2010); “Companies Act farce,” (2010) and Mabanga (2010) ("Companies Act - Now’s the Time to Fix It").
This section on business rescue in South Africa comes in 5 parts:
New business rescue legislation, contained in Chapter 6 of the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008, was signed into law on 8 April 2010 by the President, gazetted the next day, but is yet to be proclaimed..
It was preceded by the King III Report on Governance, accompanied by practice notes for business rescue, on 1 September 2009. Draft company regulations, including business rescue regulations, were published on 22 December 2009 for comment. New draft regulations will be published, but the date is unknown at this stage.
New draft business rescue legislation, contained in Chapter 6 of the Companies Amendment Bill, 2010 was published on 28 July 2010.
This draft proposes amendments to the Companies Act, 2008 to:
An USAID Financial Sector Program policy reform initiative is currently under way to assist the authorities in connection with amendments to key areas of the financial sector, including the Company Act, National Credit Act; and Insolvency Act. The ultimate aim of the project will be to prepare a mapping of the current legal frameworks pertaining to business rescue, liquidation, and insolvency, with a view to developing policy recommendations to strengthen these systems.
The dti on 28 July 2010 announced the following on its website: "During the consultation process, sections of the Act were found to be imbued with errors, while some of the regulations were considered ultra vires (beyond the powers), due to their not empowering provisions in the Act, nor enabling the Minister to issue them in order to achieve the Act's objectives. Amendments were thus required to rectify these provisions and ensure improved administration of the Act, hence the publication of the Companies Amendment Bill, 2010."
The Companies and Intellectual Property Office (CIPRO) announced on 31 July 2010 in “Update on Implementation of the Companies Act, 2008” (2010) that the new Companies Act will be implemented on 1 October 2010.
According to “Trade and Industry Releases Draft Companies Amendment Bill,” 2010, the amendment bill is still to be tabled in Parliament, it will be be subject to due process including a thirty day public comment period involving public hearings, and that current target date for implementation of the new act is October 2010.
A target date of 4th quarter 2010, however, is mentioned by “Trade and Industry Wants Companies Act in Effect by October,” 2010, and “Davies aims for new act to go live this year,” 2010.
The latter states that "business groups are equally adamant a more realistic deadline for implementation is the first half of 2011".
SAICA stated on 3 August 2010 on “Companies Act 71, of 2008,” 2010) that in meetings on 21 and 23 June 2010 between Minister Davies and the dti team, and SAICA, Cape Chamber of Commerce, Cape Law Society and broader BUSA delegation, that the following was confirmed:
The Parliament Committee Meeting Schedule lists the following dates:
Friday 10 September 2010 |
Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry, (National Assembly), [Briefing on the Companies Amendment Bill], Committee Room V454, Fourth Floor, Old Assembly Building, 08:30 |
SAICA believes a later implementation date is more reasonable on its website (“Companies Act 71, of 2008,” 2010):
"SAICA, in conjunction with the BUSA grouping, contended that, as the Act could not have become effective less than 1 year after signature by the President, the same principle should apply in the case of the Amendment Act. This provision in the Act was as a result of recognising that business needed time to prepare for the transition. Furthermore, we highlighted that we did not believe it was sensible to write Regulations concurrently with an Amendment Act. Minister Davies acknowledged that they would take cognisance of practical implementation issues such as the composition of Audit Committees, but that business should ready itself in anticipation of the impending Act."
Certain references reviewing or commenting on Chapter 6 as a whole are discussed below. Other references which focus on aspects of Chapter 6 are not listed here but at the bottom of web pages discussing those aspects.
To view an introductory video on Chapter 6 business rescue, see Harris (2010).
For an excellent summary of current issues around Chapter 6 business rescue, see “A Roundtable Discussion on the New Companies Act and Its Business Rescue Provisions” (2010).
The most comprehensive critical analysis of Chapter 6 business rescue is provided by Professor Anneli Loubser in her doctoral thesis "Some Comparative Aspects of Corporate Rescue in South African Company Law" (Loubser, 2010a). The first summarised part of her concerns and questions are available as an academic article "The Business Rescue Proceedings in the Companies Act of 2008: Concerns and Questions (Part 1)" (Loubser, 2010b).
Another useful critical analysis is that of Rushworth (2010) (A Critical Analysis of the Business Rescue Regime in the Companies Act 71 of 2008: Business Rescue: Part III"). Jonathan Rushworth (now retired) was a leading attorney in the UK at the time. He was a member of the International Reference Team for Company Law Reform in South Africa and present when Chapter 6 of the Companies Bill, 2007 was presented by the dti in Pretoria in March 2007.
Anderson (2008) in "Viewing the Proposed South African Business Rescue Provisions from an Australian Perspective" provides an interesting comparison with Australia's new business rescue legislation, but this work should be read with care since the Companies Bill rather than the Companies Act is assessed, with the latter different in many aspects assessed by Anderson.
Similarly, Bowles & Bruyns (2009) offers an interesting overview of the main issues, albeit with reference to the original bill.
Another insightful overview is by Braatvedt (2010) of Eversheds Attorneys, and Fraser (2010).
Walkers Attorneys provides a hard-hitting, somewhat cynical but humorous critical review on Chapter 6 business rescue (“Companies Act 71 of 2008,” 2010).
Moosa (2009) of Deneys Reitz Attorneys assesses the new Companies Act from a legal point of view in "Business Rescue: The Challenges".
The most useful practical guides are “Guidance on Business Rescue” (2009) by the Institute of Directors, "Chapter 6 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 - Business Rescue and Compromise with Creditors" (Levenstein & Mountjoy, 2009) by Werksmans Attorneys, and Levenstein (2010b) once again by Eric Levenstein.
Moore (2006) provides a contrarian view on the merits of business rescue.
Further useful media articles and company web sites, as well as official acts and bills are listed in the Reference section below.
Anderson, C. (2008). Viewing the Proposed South African Business Rescue Provisions from an Australian Perspective. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 1, pp. 1-31.
Loubser, A. (2004). Judicial Management as a Business Rescue Procedure in South African Corporate Law. SA Mercantile Law Journal, 16(2), pp. 137-163. (Accessible through Sabinet).
Loubser, A. (2010a, February). Some Comparative Aspects of Corporate Rescue in South African Company Law (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of South Africa.
Loubser, A. (2010b). The Business Rescue Proceedings in the Companies Act of 2008: Concerns and Questions (Part 1). Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, (3), 501-514. (Accessible through Sabinet).
Rushworth, J. (2010). A Critical Analysis of the Business Rescue Regime in the Companies Act 71 of 2008: Business Rescue: Part III. Acta Juridica, (Modern company law for a competitive South African economy), pp.375-408. (Accessible through Sabinet).
A Roundtable Discussion on the New Companies Act and Its Business Rescue Provisions. (2010, July). SBP.
Business Rescue Matters. (2009). Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Attorneys.
King, M. (2009, September 1). Guidance on Business Rescue. Institute of Directors.
Lamprecht, C. (2010, June). A Case for Business Rescue. Accountancy SA.
Levenstein, E., & Mountjoy, T. (2009, November). Chapter 6 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 - Business Rescue and Compromise with Creditors. Werksmans Attorneys.
Moosa, R. (2009, March). Business Rescue: The Challenges. Deneys Reitz Attorneys.
Bowles, R., & Bruyns, W. (2009, April). A Critical Analysis and Assessment of Proposed Provisions of Business Rescue as Contained in the Companies Bill of 2008. Couzyn Hertzog & Horak Attorneys.
Burger-van der Walt, M. (2010, March 17). Prepare for Different Ball Game with New Corporate Legislation. Webber Wentzel Attorneys.
Braatvedt, K. (2010). Insolvency and Business Rescue - What Others Say. Eversheds Attorneys.
Braatvedt, K. (2010, August 18). Chapter 6 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 Reviewed. HG.org.
Chapter 6 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 - Business Rescue and Compromise with Creditors. (2009) Werksmans.
Companies Act 71, of 2008. (2010, August 3). SAICA.
Companies Act 71 of 2008. (2010, March 17). Walkers Attorneys Incorporated.
CRS Business Rescue. (2010). Corporate Renewal Solutions.
Moore, G. (2006, May). Does Rescuing Insolvent Companies Do More Harm Than Good? The Free Market Foundation.
Moosa, R. (2009, October 6). Business Rescue: The Challenges. Deneys Reitz Attorneys.
New Companies Act [Part VI]: Business Rescue. (2010). Igwetha Training Academy.
Potgieter, D. (2010). Business Rescue. Dane Potgieter Attorneys.
Van Rensburg, H. (2010, April 3). An Analysis of the Role and Effect of the Rescue Procedure of the New Companies Act 71 of 2008 as Alternative to Liquidation of Companies. Legal Issues.
Companies Act Farce. (2010, April 7). Mail & Guardian Online.
Davies Aims for New Act to Go Live This Year. (2010, June 29). Business Report.
Fraser, G. (2010, August 19). You May Be Right - but You May Be Wrong, Too! Legalbrief.
Levenstein, E. (2010a, May 28). Business Rescue Due. Engineering News.
Levenstein, E. (2010b, June). The New Companies Act: Business Rescue Now an Option. Management Today, 28(5), pp. 6-8. (Accessible through Sabinet).
Iodsa: Statement by the Institute of Directors South Africa on Changes in the Draft Companies Amendment Bill. (2010, August 30). Polity.org.za.
Mabanga, T. (2010, May 13). Companies Act - Now’s the Time to Fix It. Financial Mail.
Newham, F. (2010, July 29). New Bill Attempts to Unite Knots in Flawed Legislation. Business Report.
Pity Davies, Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place. (2010, June 29). Business Report.
Smit, P. (2010, August 13). Draft of Companies Amendment Bill Sees the Light. Engineering News.
Swanepoel, E. (2009, November 11). Business Rescues in New Act May Have Undesirable Results. Business Report.
Temkin, S. (2010, July 29). Grammar Fixes Used ‘to Play down Legislation Changes’. Business Day.
Trade and Industry Releases Draft Companies Amendment Bill. (2010, July 28). Sabinet.
Trade and Industry Wants Companies Act in Effect by October. (2010, June 29). SabinetLaw.
Harris, A. (2010). Business Rescue. Bowman Gilfillan Attorneys
Chapter 6 of the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008. (2009, April 9). Government Gazette.
Chapter 6 of the Draft Companies Regulations. (2009, December 22). Government Gazette.
Chapter 6 of the Final Companies Amendment Bill, 2010. (2010, July 28). Department of Trade and Industry.
Companies Act No. 71 of 2008. (2009, April 9). Government Gazette.
Companies Regulations Pursuant to the Companies Act, 2008 (Act No. 71 of 2008). (2009, December 22). Government Gazette.
Final Companies Amendment Bill 2010. (2010, July 28). Department of Trade and Industry.
King, M. (2009, September 1). King III Code of Governance for South Africa. Institute of Directors.
King, M. (2009, September 1). King III Report on Governance in South Africa. Institute of Directors.
Update on Implementation of the Companies Act, 2008. (2010, July 31). Companies and Intellectual Property Office.
Rather than signing in as a guest, we strongly recommend registering for a Disqus profile first!
blog comments powered by Disqus